14 Sep A student notifies you that she has been subjected to bullying through a classmate’s Facebook page. In 500-750 words address the following: Provide the steps you are required to take
A student notifies you that she has been subjected to bullying through a classmate’s Facebook page.
In 500-750 words address the following:
- Provide the steps you are required to take that are consistent with state statutes, your district’s school board policies, faculty handbook, and the student handbook;
- Any First Amendment arguments you think the student with the Facebook page may raise; and
- Responses you could make to the First Amendment arguments that are consistent with the cases in the assigned readings
Cyberbullying and the First Amendment – Rubric
Required Steps 25 points
Criteria Description
Steps you are required to take that are consistent with state statutes, your district's school board policies,
faculty handbook, and the student handbook
5. Target 25 points
Steps required for this situation are in a detailed outline with clear examples from state statutes, district's
school board policies, faculty handbook, and the student handbook.
4. Acceptable 21.75 points
Steps required for this situation are clearly outlined with clear examples from state statutes, district's
school board policies, faculty handbook, and the student handbook.
3. Approaching 19.75 points
Steps required for this situation are outlined with basic references regarding state statutes, district's
school board policies, faculty handbook, and the student handbook.
2. Insufficient 18.5 points
Some steps required for this situation are outlined and are unclear. Not all entities are explored (regarding
state statutes, district's school board policies, faculty handbook, and the student handbook).
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
No required steps are outlined. Essay does not include any information regarding state statutes, district's
school board policies, faculty handbook, or the student handbook.
Collapse All
Any First Amendment arguments you think the student with the Facebook page may raise. 20 points
Criteria Description
Any First Amendment arguments you think the student with the Facebook page may raise.
5. Target 20 points
Essay includes several potential arguments the student with the Facebook page may raise, presented
clearly with relevant resources.
4. Acceptable 17.4 points
Essay includes multiple potential arguments the student with the Facebook page may raise. Arguments are
clear.
3. Approaching 15.8 points
Essay includes a potential First Amendment argument the student with the Facebook page may raise. The
argument is somewhat vague.
2. Insufficient 14.8 points
Essay includes very little information about any First Amendment argument(s) from the student.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Essay does not include any First Amendment student argument(s) regarding the Facebook page.
Responses You Could Make to the First Amendment Arguments 25 points
Criteria Description
Responses you could make to the First Amendment arguments that are consistent with the cases in the
assigned readings.
5. Target 25 points
Essay includes several responses to potential arguments the student with the Facebook page may raise,
presented clearly with relevant resources to support claims.
4. Acceptable 21.75 points
Essay includes multiple responses to any potential arguments the student with the Facebook page may
raise. Response is clear.
3. Approaching 19.75 points
Essay includes a potential response to the First Amendment argument the student with the Facebook page
may raise. Response is somewhat vague.
2. Insufficient 18.5 points
Essay includes very little information about any responses to First Amendment argument(s) from the
student.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific
audience.
4. Acceptable 6.09 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific
audience.
3. Approaching 5.53 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is
demonstrated.
2. Insufficient 5.18 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is
limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
Development, Structure, Conclusion and 500-750-word count 8 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. Essay
meets 500-750-word count.
5. Target 8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of
ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the
purpose. Minimum word count is met.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and
unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. Minimum word count
is met.
3. Approaching 6.32 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion
aligns to the development of the purpose. Minimum word count is met.
2. Insufficient 5.92 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in
organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development
of the purpose. Minimum word count is not met.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence 5 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
5. Target 5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated
effectively.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
3. Approaching 3.95 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2. Insufficient 3.7 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other
perspectives is present.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used
throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching 3.95 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence
structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 3.7 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence
structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence
structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation 5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using
citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. A minimum of
five sources are used.
5. Target 5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and
synthesis of sources is demonstrated. Minimum of five sources is met or exceeded.
4. Acceptable 4.35 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. Minimum of five sources is met.
3. Approaching 3.95 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. Minimum of five
sources is met.
2. Insufficient 3.7 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of
sources are evident. Minimum of five sources is not met.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used No documentation of sources is provided No sources used Total 100 points
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.